ICA-based artefact and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved Resting State Network imaging

By Ludovica Griffanti, Gholamreza Salimi Khorshidi, Christian F. Beckmann, E. Auerbach, Gwenaëlle Douaud, Claire E. Sexton, Eniko Zsoldos, Nicola Filippini, Clare E. Mackay, Steen Moeller and 6 more. NeuroImage, 2014

1,311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The identification of resting state networks (RSNs) and the quantification of their functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI (rfMRI) are seriously hindered by the presence of artefacts, many of which overlap spatially or spectrally with RSNs. Moreover, recent developments in fMRI acquisition yield data with higher spatial and temporal resolutions, but may increase artefacts both spatially and/or temporally. Hence the correct identification and removal of non-neural fluctuations is crucial, especially in accelerated acquisitions. In this paper we investigate the effectiveness of three data-driven cleaning procedures, compare standard against higher (spatial and temporal) resolution accelerated fMRI acquisitions, and investigate the combined effect of different acquisitions and different cleanup approaches. We applied single-subject independent component analysis (ICA), followed by automatic component classification with FMRIB’s ICA-based X-noiseifier (FIX) to identify artefactual components. We then compared two first-level (within-subject) cleaning approaches for removing those artefacts and motion-related fluctuations from the data. The effectiveness of the cleaning procedures were assessed using timeseries (amplitude and spectra), network matrix and spatial map analyses. For timeseries and network analyses we also tested the effect of a second-level cleaning (informed by group-level analysis). Comparing these approaches, the preferable balance between noise removal and signal loss was achieved by regressing out of the data the full space of motion-related fluctuations and only the unique variance of the artefactual ICA components. Using similar analyses, we also investigated the effects of different cleaning approaches on data from different acquisition sequences. With the optimal cleaning procedures, functional connectivity results from accelerated data were statistically comparable or significantly better than the standard (unaccelerated) acquisition, and, crucially, with higher spatial and temporal resolution. Moreover, we were able to perform higher dimensionality ICA decompositions with the accelerated data, which is very valuable for detailed network analyses.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/feec8b37445c5e814fdef9cdcd0a5881d442632f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Stephen M. Smith
  2. Olaf Sporns
  3. Matthew F. Glasser
  4. Christian F. Beckmann
  5. Mark William Woolrich
  6. Xi-Nian Zuo
  7. Timothy Edward John Behrens
  8. B. T. T. Yeo

Citations in the corpus