Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex From Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI

By Alexander Schaefer, Ru Kong, Evan M. Gordon, Timothy O. Laumann, Xi-Nian Zuo, Avram J. Holmes, Simon B. Eickhoff, B. T. T. Yeo, B. T. T. Yeo. bioRxiv, 2017

3,664 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A central goal in systems neuroscience is the parcellation of the cerebral cortex into discrete neurobiological “atoms”. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) offers the possibility of in-vivo human cortical parcellation. Almost all previous parcellations relied on one of two approaches. The local gradient approach detects abrupt transitions in functional connectivity patterns. These transitions potentially reflect cortical areal boundaries defined by histology or visuotopic fMRI. By contrast, the global similarity approach clusters similar functional connectivity patterns regardless of spatial proximity, resulting in parcels with homogeneous (similar) rs-fMRI signals. Here we propose a gradient-weighted Markov Random Field (gwMRF) model integrating local gradient and global similarity approaches. Using task-fMRI and rs-fMRI across diverse acquisition protocols, we found gwMRF parcellations to be more homogeneous than four previously published parcellations. Furthermore, gwMRF parcellations agreed with the boundaries of certain cortical areas defined using histology and visuotopic fMRI. Some parcels captured sub-areal (somatotopic and visuotopic) features that likely reflect distinct computational units within known cortical areas. These results suggest that gwMRF parcellations reveal neurobiologically meaningful features of brain organization and are potentially useful for future applications requiring dimensionality reduction of voxel-wise fMRI data. Multi-resolution parcellations generated from 1489 participants are available (https://github.com/ThomasYeoLab/CBIG/tree/master/stable_projects/brain_parcellation/Schaefer2018_LocalGlobal)

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3f634afff84fc0dc1b82d049eabf4d7c236d67e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Olaf Sporns
  2. Steven E. Petersen
  3. Michael P. Milham
  4. Bradley L. Schlaggar
  5. Timothy O. Laumann
  6. R. Nathan Spreng
  7. Nico U F Dosenbach
  8. Abraham Z. Snyder

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Steven E. Petersen
  2. Bradley L. Schlaggar
  3. Timothy O. Laumann
  4. Olaf Sporns
  5. Nico U F Dosenbach
  6. Michael P. Milham
  7. Abraham Z. Snyder
  8. Evan M. Gordon

Citations in the corpus