An evolutionarily stable strategy for aggressiveness in feeding groups

By E. Sirot. 2000

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fecfdd6922d2df4e29737b5bf5b0fa0601f2e72a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. J. Gils
2. Jaap van der Meer
3. J. Grant
4. Franz J. Weissing
5. T. Piersma
6. Olof Leimar

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. J. Gils
2. J. Grant
3. Franz J. Weissing
4. T. Piersma

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Gils
2. Jaap van der Meer
3. J. Grant
4. L. Lefebvre
5. Franz J. Weissing
6. T. Piersma

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of the temporal predictability and spatial clumping of food on the intensity of competitive aggression in the Zenaida dove (2001, background): “The increase in aggression at extremely high competitor densities may be caused by doves becoming increasingly hawk-like (sensu Maynard-Smith 1982) in the face of increased crowding, as observed in other species of birds (Morse, 1980) and predicted by a game theory model of social foraging (Sirot, 2”
• The mechanisms of interference competition: two experiments on foraging waders (2005, background): “Most mechanistic models of interference competition assume that animals interact over individual food items (e.g., Giraldeau and Caraco, 2000; Sirot, 2000; Stillman et al., 1997).”
• Digestively constrained predators evade the cost of interference competition (2004, background): “…respond (i) in a fixed way (e.g. Beddington 1975; DeAngelis, Goldstein & O’Neill 1975; Crowley & Martin 1989; Ruxton, Guerney & de Roos 1992) or (ii) in an optimal way (which depends on the difference in social dominance, e.g. Stillman, GossCustard & Caldow 1997; Broom & Ruxton 1998; Sirot 2000).”