Digestively constrained predators evade the cost of interference competition

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. I. Prey choice (2005, unknown): “2003a, 2003b, 2005; Van Gils & Piersma 2004).”
Group-size and distance-to-neighbour effects on feeding and vigilance in brown-headed cowbirds (2007, background): “…in feeding rate and vigilance as a function of changes in group size, few have been able to control potentially confounding variables, such as food density, which can influence feeding rate and vigilance as much as can group size (Elgar 1989; Beauchamp 1998; but see van Gils & Piersma 2004).”
Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator–prey interactions (2012, background): “…per capita kill rates decrease at increasing predator density because of direct aggressive interactions among searching predators (McCarthy et al. 1995, van Gils & Piersma 2004, Kratina et al. 2009); they may describe well predator dependence at low predator densities as well (Kratina et al. 2009).”
Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. II. Patch choice and length of working day (2005, background): “…processing rate shaping functional responses and thus foraging decisions is rapidly gaining momentum (Kersten & Visser 1996; Zwarts et al. 1996; Jeschke et al. 2002; Van Gils et al. 2003a, b; Zharikov & Skilleter 2003; Van Gils & Piersma 2004; Karasov & McWilliams 2004; Van Gils et al. 2004).”