The Use of Confrontation in Addiction Treatment History, Science, and Time for Change

By W. White, W. Miller. 2007

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fec1768251f776f75e7d410f751583fb8e6606c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. W. Miller
2. G. Rose
3. S. Rollnick
4. J. Passmore
5. D. Forrester
6. Brian L. Burke
7. Mary McMurran
8. T. Moyers

Citations in the corpus

• Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. (2009, background): “The confrontational, authoritarian and coercive forms of addiction treatment described as “disease model” and “12-step” in the late 20th century were quite at variance with original descriptions of the program of Alcoholics Anonymous (Miller and Kurtz, 1994; White and Miller, 2007).”
• Toward a Theory of Motivational Interviewing (2009, result): “…talk,” which was originally subsumed in MI within the concept of “resistance”) represented the other side of the client’s ambivalence, to which the counselor was to respond empathically, a clear contrast with the confrontational style of addiction counseling at the time (White & Miller, 2007).”