SELF‐CONTROL AND VICTIMIZATION: A META‐ANALYSIS

By Travis C. Pratt, J. Turanovic, K. Fox, Kevin A. Wright. 2014

413 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/feb7a3e8bc988d16053904dfa1ec442e46f841f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Taking Stock of the Relationship Between Gang Membership and Offending (2016, methodology): “Although it is common practice to include both bivariate and multivariate effect size estimates in meta-analyses of studies using correlational research designs (e.g., Baier & Wright, 2001; Paternoster, 1987; Pratt et al., 2014), the use of each effect size proxy carries certain limitations.”
The Consequences of Identity Theft Victimization: An Examination of Emotional and Physical Health Outcomes (2017, background): “It is important to note, however, that the same factors that initially increase victimization risk, such as low self-control, may also influence coping behaviors (Pratt et al., 2014; Turanovic & Pratt, 2014).”
Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. (2020, background): “It is common and appropriate to explore crude and multivariable controlled effects in separate meta-analyses (e.g., Pratt et al., 2014).”
Risky Lifestyles, Low Self-control, and Violent Victimization Across Gendered Pathways to Crime (2015, background): “The body of studies focusing on the self-control-victimization link is now quite extensive (Pratt et al. 2014).”
Lifestyle and Routine Activity Theories Revisited: The Importance of “Risk” to the Study of Victimization (2016, methodology): “…studies linking self-control and lifestyle/routine activity theories have been conducted (Holtfreter et al., 2008; Schreck et al., 2006; Stewart et al., 2004) and this work has proven quite useful in explaining victimization (Franklin, 2011; Pratt et al., 2014; Reyns, Henson, & Fisher, 2011).”
The Victimization of LGBTQ Students at School: A Meta-Analysis (2020, methodology): “…advantages and shortcomings of meta-analyses have been discussed at length elsewhere (Glass, 2015), but a key strength of the method is that it can provide a more objective picture of what a body of empirical work “ really says ” about a given topic (Pratt, Turanovic, Fox, & Wright, 2014, p. 91).”