Emotional reactions to infidelity

By T. Shackelford, Gregory J. LeBlanc, Elizabeth Drass. 2000

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Describing the emotional states that are expressed in speech (2003, background): “, 1983) and complex emotions (Shackelford et al., 2000) simply by having participants imagine situations involving the desired target emotions.”
Sex differences in jealousy: a meta-analytic examination (2012, background): “Thus, for most of the analyses, each independent sample (including Shackelford et al., 2000) provided a single average effect.”
Dispositional anxiety and risk-avoidant decision-making. (2007, background): “Emotions serve as salient forms of information, signaling the presence of particular threats to be avoided or rewards to be acquired (Schwarz & Clore, 1983; Shackelford, LeBlanc, & Drass, 2000 ).”
Sex differences in human jealousy: A coordinated study of forced-choice, continuous rating-scale, and physiological responses on the same subjects (2002, background): “Finally, Shackelford et al. (2000) found that relative to men, women rated themselves more Helpless/Abandoned and Shocked for both types of infidelity, but that the mean sex differences were greater for emotional than for sexual infidelity.”