Waste, recycling, and “Design for Environment”: Roles for markets and policy instruments

By P. Calcott, Margaret Walls. 2005

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe33d3bec92f340c36e17552df88394ced88aee1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. N. Hanley
2. Mikoaj Czajkowski
3. Tadeusz Kądziela
4. Eda Kemahlioglu-Ziya
5. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan
6. Gökçe Esenduran
7. C. Spash
8. Karine Nyborg

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Eda Kemahlioglu-Ziya
2. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan
3. Gökçe Esenduran
4. N. Hanley
5. K. Turner

Citations in the corpus

• We want to sort! – assessing households’ preferences for sorting waste (2014, background): “Much work has been undertaken within economics to understand the determinants of household recycling behavior (Hong et al. 1993; Jenkins et al. 2003; Calcott & Walls 2005).”
• Extended Producer Responsibility and Product Design: Economic Theory and Selected Case Studies (2006, unknown): “For this reason, Calcott and Walls (2005) set up a slightly different but more realistic framework and solve for the instruments that can achieve the constrained optimum.”
• Impact of Take‐Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry (2017, background): “Early papers (e.g., Calcott and Walls 2000, Calcott and Walls 2005, Palmer and Walls 1997, Walls 2001, Walls et al. 2005) compared policies such as taxes, deposit/refund schemes, disposal fees, and recycling subsidies in terms of their ability to achieve social optimality.”