The Evolution and Function of Stylar Polymorphisms in Flowering Plants

By S. Barrett, L. Jesson, A. M. Baker. 2000

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe2ac3a94d1ff82b6a44866d46a907d192711cc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Shore
2. P. Oliveira
3. S. Barrett
4. K. Lunau

In Molecular Biology

1. J. Shore
2. S. Barrett
3. K. Lunau

In Plant Science

1. S. Barrett

Citations in the corpus

• New Insights on Heterostyly: Comparative Biology, Ecology and Genetics (2008, background): “…other stylar polymorphisms have also been recognized with their own distinctive features [e.g. stigma-height dimorphism (Baker et al. 2000a, b; Barrett et al. 2000a); enantiostyly (Barrett 2002; Jesson and Barrett 2003); flexistyly (Li et al. 2001; Renner 2001; Sun et al. 2007); inversostyly…”
• Evolution of sex: The evolution of plant sexual diversity (2002, background): “These viewpoints can be readily understood by considering functional interpretations of sexual polymorphisms that involve the spatial arrangement of female and male reproductive organ”
• Moth pollination of woody species in the Cerrados of Central Brazil: a case of so much owed to so few? (2004, background): “2PP). The style remains erect in the centre of the completely open flower and the stigmatic surface may be turned to the right or to the left (monomorphic enantiostyly or enantiomorphy Barrett and Jesson 2000 ).”