Evolution of sex: The evolution of plant sexual diversity

By S. Barrett. Nature reviews genetics, 2002

1,254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4541811ef892330ba373dad3b184f3ee3516e8ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Molecular Biology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

New Insights on Heterostyly: Comparative Biology, Ecology and Genetics (2008, neutral): “…also been recognized with their own distinctive features [e.g. stigma-height dimorphism (Baker et al. 2000a, b; Barrett et al. 2000a); enantiostyly (Barrett 2002; Jesson and Barrett 2003); flexistyly (Li et al. 2001; Renner 2001; Sun et al. 2007); inversostyly (Pauw 2005)] raising new questions…”
Adaptive radiation and coevolution — pollination biology case studies (2004, positive): “Reduction of sexual interference and self-pollination required separation of the staminate and pistillate functions of flowers either in time or in space: the separation of the staminate and pistillate floral functions in space is correlated with the evolution of secondary polymorphisms such as seco”
Loss of Self‐Incompatibility and Its Evolutionary Consequences (2008, background): “Within a population, the fate of SC mutations will be determined principally by the magnitudes of inbreeding depression, pollen discounting, and the power of selection favoring reproductive assurance (reviewed in Barrett 2002; Schoen and Busch 2007).”
Density‐dependent pollen limitation and reproductive assurance in a wind‐pollinated herb with contrasting sexual systems (2011, background): “Indeed, selection for reproductiveassurance in the faceofpollenormate limitation is widely viewed as the prime reason for the frequent evolutionary transition from outcrossing to selfing in plants (e.g. Maurice & Fleming 1995; Barrett 2002; Kalisz, Vogler & Hanley 2004; Wolf & Takebayashi 2004).”
REVIEW: PART OF A SPECIAL ISSUE ON PLANT MATING SYSTEMS How much better are females? The occurrence of female advantage, its proximal causes and its variation within and among gynodioecious species (2011, background): “(2005); (2)Keller and Schwaegerle (2006); (3)Thompson and Tarayre (2000); (4)Kohn and Biardi (1995); (5)Mutikainen and Delph (1998); (6)Glaettli and Goudet (2006). Dufay & Billard — Female advantage in gynodioecious species 512”
The evolution of floral scent: the influence of olfactory learning by insect pollinators on the honest signalling of floral rewards (2009, neutral): “Self-pollination lowers fitness as it reduces the amount of pollen available for out-crossing (i.e. pollen discounting) and leads to the production of seeds with lower fitness as a result of inbreeding depression (Barrett 2002).”
The Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Clonality for Plant Mating (2010, background): “Deposition of incompatible (self-) pollen can also reduce seed set as a result of pollen-pistil interference (e.g., via pollen clogging or ovule discounting; reviewed in Barrett 2002a).”
The staminal lever mechanism in Salvia L. (Lamiaceae): a key innovation for adaptive radiation? (2004, background): “1994), and orchids (Dressler 1968, 1981), as well as birdpollinated species in Heliconia (Stiles 1975), and heterostylous species (Barrett 2002).”
Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation (2009, background): “, and the lack of evolutionary success of most asexual and highly inbreeding specie”
Molecular Phylogenetics of Core Brassicales, Placement of Orphan Genera Emblingia, Forchhammeria, Tirania, and Character Evolution (2004, neutral): “Generally, hypotheses of evolutionary pathways to dioecy include gynodioecious or monoecious intermediates (Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1978; Sytsma et al. 1991; Barrett 2002).”
Proposals for a terminology for diatom sexual reproduction, auxospores and resting stages (2013, background): “…of hermaphroditism is also common among individuals of flowering plants and readers may find it helpful to refer to reviews of angiosperm reproductive terminology in, for example, Richards (1986), Klinkhamer et al. (1997), Barrett (2002), de Jong & Klinkhamer (2005) and Harder & Barrett (2006).”
Reproductive Assurance and the Evolution of Pollination Specialization (2007, background): “Extensive reviews of both fields exist (e.g., Faegri and van der Pijl 1979; Barrett 2002; Fenster et al. 2004), and the importance of simultaneously studying both mating and pollination systems has recently been underscored (Harder and Barrett 1996; Holsinger 1996; Barrett 2003).”