The effects of captive experience on reintroduction survival in carnivores: A review and analysis

By K. Jule, L. Leaver, S. Lea. 2008

380 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Environmental enrichment reduces maladaptive risk-taking behavior in salmon reared for conservation (2011, background): “…artificially-reared fish to recognise predators, further enhancing anti-predatory behaviors (Berejikian et al., 2003; Vilhunen, 2006), just as it had previously been shown for birds (e.g. Maloney and McLean, 1995; McLean et al., 1999) and mammals (e.g. McLean et al., 1996; Jule et al., 2008).”
Animal Translocations: What are they and why do we do them? (2012, neutral): “…the restoration of populations of large carnivores, where local community attitudes and behaviours can be significant determinants of project outcomes (Hayward et al., 2007; Hunter et al., 2007; Jule et al., 2008; Lohr et al., 1996; Meadow et al., 2005; Nilsen et al., 2007; Zahniser & Singh, 2004).”
Captive breeding genetics and reintroduction success (2009, background): “Numerous real reintroduction projects have required several generations of captive breeding in order to reintroduce locally dozens or hundreds of individuals (see, e.g., Schaub et al., 2009, for a case study on the Bearded vulture, and Jule et al., 2008 for numerous examples in carnivores).”