Captive breeding genetics and reintroduction success

By A. Robert. 2009

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad9d4772471bfef125185204cc403ab94c5bfaeb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. A. Hochkirch
2. Kathrin A. Witzenberger
3. Christian Kerbiriou
4. M. Saint-Jalme
5. B. Colas
6. J. Mihoub
7. I. Guigon
8. François Sarrazin

In Genetics

1. A. Hochkirch
2. Kathrin A. Witzenberger
3. M. Saint-Jalme
4. François Sarrazin
5. Christian Kerbiriou
6. B. Colas
7. J. Mihoub
8. I. Guigon

Citations in the corpus

• Ex situ conservation genetics: a review of molecular studies on the genetic consequences of captive breeding programmes for endangered animal species (2011, background): “Captive breeding programmes should aim at the creation and conservation of healthy, self-sustaining captive populations that resemble their wild counterparts as closely as possible both in behaviour and genetics (Frankham 2008; Robert 2009; Goncalves da Silva et al. 2010; Ralls and Ballou 1986).”
• Defining reintroduction success using IUCN criteria for threatened species: a demographic assessment (2015, methodology): “If genetic processes substantially impact population dynamics in reintroduced populations (Kirchner, Robert & Colas, 2006; Robert, 2009; Groombridge et al., 2012), this impact may complicate the use of the IUCN Red List criteria to assess the ultimate success of reintroduction programs.”