Introducing environmental equity dimensions into the sustainable transport discourse: issues and pitfalls

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Review of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices in Canada (2012, background): “Many studies focused only on the environmental aspects (Drumwright 1994; Feitelson 2002; Sarkis 2009) or social aspects (Cousins and Menguc 2005; Castka and Balzarova 2007; Hutchins and Sutherland 2008; Ciliberti et al. 2009) of SSCM.”
Distributive justice and equity in transportation (2016, background): “…how policies impact the affordability of transport goods and services for different income classes (Levinson, 2010; Pucher, 1981); and which social groups are more exposed to transport-related externalities, such as pollution and traffic accidents (Feitelson, 2002; Forkenbrock & Schweitzer, 1999).”
A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the United States (2012, background): “…is a fundamental point, as much of the debate on transport and equity has focused precisely on the distribution of transport-related burdens (e.g., Feitelson, 2002; Forkenbrock and Schweitzer, 1999; Schweitzer and Valenzuela, 2004).1 1 Walzer‟s approach does not suggest that the distribution of…”