Nothing At The Center?: Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field
By Kalle J. Lyytinen, John Leslie King. Journal of the AIS, 2004
295 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe0fddaea198d60c6c7b200508000738bf198c63
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Leslie P. Willcocks
- Shaji Khan
- Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic
- Mary C. Lacity
- Geoff Walsham
- Sebastian K. Boell
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Sociology and Political Science
- Leslie P. Willcocks
- Shaji Khan
- Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic
- Mary C. Lacity
- Geoff Walsham
- Sebastian K. Boell
- Kieran Conboy
- Chrisanthi Avgerou
Citations in the corpus
- Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field (2012, background): “Lyytinen and King (2004) also emphasised the importance of the issues studied and the maintenance of disciplinary plasticity.”
- What is an Information System? (2015, background): “Such tendency of the technology view of IS to adopt a technology deterministic perspective has attracted its fair share of criticism in the literature [42; 56; 59].”
- A review of the IT outsourcing empirical literature and future research directions (2010, background): “Seek to inform reference discipline theories as much as we seek to be informed Within the IS discipline in general and within ITO in particular, a number of scholars have criticized our reliance on reference disciplines (e.g., Lyytinen and King, 2004; Busi and McIvor, 2008; Niederman et al ., 2008).”