Rabi oscillations in a large Josephson-junction qubit.
By John M. Martinis, Sae Woo Nam, J. Aumentado, C. Urbina. Physical Review Letters, 2002
815 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fdad3f9d7da8dbb931cf808c0b2e8ecc40de9f0f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Citations in the corpus
- Decoherence in solid-state qubits (2008, background): “view the latest results on decoherence of superconducting phase qubits [93, 94 ].”
- Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in physics, chemistry, and beyond (2016, background): “Superconducting qubits are classified into three types, based on their degrees of freedom: charge (Bouchiat et al., 1998; Nakamura et al., 1999), flux (Friedman et al., 2000; van der Wal et al., 2000), and phase (Martinis et al., 2002), see Fig.”
- Quantum computers (2010, neutral): “In the phase qubit 75 , the potential is biased at a different point and again E J / E C ?”
- Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits (2011, background): “1(c) the current-driven junction for a phase qubit [8, 9].”
- Natural and artificial atoms for quantum computation (2010, background): “1999 1 ns − Charge [65] 2002 580 ns 2 ns Charge [66] 2002 100 ns 100 ns Phase [67] 2002 1.”