Natural and artificial atoms for quantum computation
By Iulia Maria Buluta, Sahel Ashhab, Franco Nori. 2010
650 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Remarkable progress towards realizing quantum computation has been achieved using natural and artificial atoms as qubits. This paper presents a brief overview of the current status of different types of qubits. On the one hand, natural atoms (such as neutral atoms and ions) have long coherence times, and could be stored in large arrays, providing ideal ‘quantum memories’. On the other hand, artificial atoms (such as superconducting circuits or semiconductor quantum dots) have the advantage of custom-designed features and could be used as ‘quantum processing units’. Natural and artificial atoms can be coupled with each other and can also be interfaced with photons for long-distance communications. Hybrid devices made of natural/artificial atoms and photons may provide the next-generation design for quantum computers.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/034c0b887d3c10b7bc075cc19b141092cdc32a4d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Citations in the corpus
- Open quantum systems with local and collective incoherent processes: Efficient numerical simulations using permutational invariance (2018, background): “Nowadays the quantum properties of single TLSs can be investigated on many different physical platforms beyond atoms, including trapped ions and NV centers, quantum dots, and superconducting circuits [1,2].”
- Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light (2013, background): “Conversely, optical frequencies provide access to low-loss transmission [4] and long-lived quantum-compatible storage [5, 6].”
- Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems (2012, background): “, (Buluta et al., 2011; Hanson and Awschalom, 2008; Kane, 1998)], and superconducting qubits [e.”
- Superconducting quantum computing: a review (2020, neutral): “[94] for a similar table).”
- Quantum computing with atomic qubits and Rydberg interactions: progress and challenges (2016, background): “Aspects of quantum computation with trapped neutral atoms have been reviewed in [18, 19, 12, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27].”
- Quantum Simulation (2013, background): “One of the systems that are being considered as candidate platforms for implementing quantum computation is NV centers in diamond (Buluta et al., 2011; Ladd et al., 2010).”
- Colloquium: Stimulating uncertainty: Amplifying the quantum vacuum with superconducting circuits (2011, background): “The possibility to generate vacuum amplification effects in superconducting circuit devices is largely due to their use in quantum information and computation (Buluta et al., 2011; You and Nori, 2005, 2011).”
- Silicon quantum electronics (2012, background): “While there are many proposed physical realizations for quantum information processors (Buluta et al., 2011; Ladd et al., 2010; Lloyd, 1993), semiconductor-based quantum bits (qubits) are extremely interesting, in no small part because of their commonalities with classical electronics (Kane, 1998;…”
- Nonperturbative theory of weak pre-and post-selected measurements (2011, background): “[8–17]) have made it more important to understand quantum measurement.”
- Leggett–Garg inequalities (2013, background): “Most experimental tests of LGIs to-date have been performed on two-level systems or qubits [36], the most elementary of quantum systems.”