Virtual-Communities, Virtual Settlements & Cyber-Archaeology: A Theoretical Outline
By Quentin Jones. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 2006
415 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd990bacc34385db972ce2ecbdf795060c9b2326
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Michele Zappavigna
- Stephanie M. Reich
- Jannis Androutsopoulos
- Stephanie Watts
- David Gefen
- Wei Zhang
- Catherine M. Ridings
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Jannis Androutsopoulos
- Michele Zappavigna
- Stephanie M. Reich
- Stephanie Watts
- David Gefen
- Wei Zhang
- Catherine M. Ridings
- Mohamed M. Mostafa
In Sociology and Political Science
- Catherine M. Ridings
- David Gefen
- Jannis Androutsopoulos
- Stephanie M. Reich
- Michele Zappavigna
- Stephanie Watts
- Wei Zhang
- Earl L. Reid
Citations in the corpus
- Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication (2006, background): “For example: contractions in English; reductions and clitizations in German; truncations and the replacement of the e caduc by an apostrophe in French (Anis 1999a: 87–88).”
- Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online (2006, background): “Jones, 1997; Liu, 1999; Witmer & Katzman, 1998), the study included only active communities with a minimum traffic volume, a minimum number of different users posting, and a high proportion of messages with responses. This was necessary in order to exclude inactive communities and communities where ”
- Capitalizing on Content: Information Adoption in Two Online communities (2008, background): “Online communities have been characterized as having “a minimum level of interactivity, a variety of communicators, a minimum level of sustained membership,” and a virtual “common-public-space” where interactive Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) occurs (Jones, 1997).”
- Information Overload and the Message Dynamics of Online Interaction Spaces: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Exploration (2004, background): “We adopt here the term virtual public for two reasons: It is important that we distinguish between cybersociety (Jones 1995), virtual communities (Jones 1997), and open online interactions spaces (Jones and Rafaeli 2000a).”
- From information seeking to information avoidance: Understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis (2020, background): “During the span of the last three decades, the researchers proved that information overload results in cognitive strain Jones (1997); Schick et al. (1990) , stress (Lee, Son & Kim, 2016a), confusion, depressive symptoms (Matthews et al., 2020), anxiety (Bawden & Robinson, 2009), and low motivation…”
- Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning: Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis (2004, neutral): “…of criteria, and an attempt to operationalize them empirically, see Liu (1999), who bases his analysis of community in Internet Relay Chat (IRC) on Jones’ (1997) four criteria for a "virtual settlement:" (1) a virtual common-public-space; (2) a variety of communicators; (3) a minimum level of…”
- Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Online Travel Communities (2014, background): “Previous research guidelines suggest that to correctly gauge true interaction among community members, inactive online community members should be excluded (i.e., Q. Jones, 1997; Qu & Lee, 2011; Ridings et al., 2002).”
- Adolescents' sense of community on myspace and facebook: a mixed-methods approach. (2010, background): “For instance, Jones (1997) has suggested that some online groups are virtual communities whereas others are virtual settlements, with fewer stable members, less frequent interaction, and fewer emotional connections.”
- Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter (2011, background): “…for its vagueness, there has been a debate surrounding the criteria for establishing the bounds of online communities, the structure of community and how communities are built or emerge (see for example Hagel and Armstrong, 1997; Jones, 1997; Burnett, 2000; Wellman, 2001; Herring, 2004, 2008).”