Social-ecological outcomes of agricultural intensification

By L. V. Rasmussen, B. Coolsaet, Adrian Martin, O. Mertz, U. Pascual, E. Corbera, Neil Dawson, Joshua B. Fisher, P. Franks, C. Ryan. Nature Sustainability, 2018

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Fostering natural forest regeneration on former agricultural land through economic and policy interventions (2020, background): “…mechanized agricultural systems, however, has often displaced traditional smallholder agriculture, putting natural regeneration of forests in limbo with regard to land management policies, environmental regulations, and restoration targets (Wood et al 2016,Martin et al 2018, Rasmussen et al 2018).”
Towards nexus-based governance: defining interactions between economic activities and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (2020, background): “…aquaculture may help end hunger by improving people’s access to safe, nutritious and sufficient food [2.1], in enhancing the productivity of agriculture, particularly concerning small-scale farmers [2.3], and in ensuring sustainable food production systems [2.4] (FAO 2017; Rasmussen et al. 2018).”
Agricultural intensification, dietary diversity, and markets in the global food security narrative (2019, background): “A recent review found that agricultural intensification rarely leads to simultaneous positive ecosystem services and human well-being outcomes (Rasmussen et al., 2018).”