MODELING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FIRM IT CAPABILITY, COLLABORATION, AND PERFORMANCE

By Nada R. Sanders, R. Premus. 2005

491 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Power Asymmetry, Adaptation and Collaboration in Dyadic Relationships Involving a Powerful Partner (2013, unknown): “…wide range of organizational activities including joint planning, cost control, quality improvement, developing cross-functional processes, goal setting, performance measurement, etc. (Gulati & Sytch, 2007; Heide & John, 1990; Min et al., 2005; Sanders & Premus, 2005; Zacharia, Nix, & Lusch, 2009).”
Market-based capabilities and financial performance of firms: insights into marketing’s contribution to firm value (2009, background): “A second related trend is the use of information technology tools for transmission and processing of information necessary for synchronous decision making (Sanders and Premus 2005).”
A critical review of survey-based research in supply chain integration (2008, background): “, 2001; Sanders and Premus, 2005), firm IT capability (Sanders and Premus, 2005) and supplier evaluation communication strategy (Prahinski and Benton, 2004).”
Financing buyer–supplier dyads: an empirical analysis on financial collaboration in the supply chain (2016, background): “…plans, forecasts and demand figures 2.92 1.03 Claassen, Van Weele, and van Raaij (2008) IS2 We share cost information with our supplier 2.51 0.96 Sanders and Premus (2005) IS3 Knowledge of inventory levels 2.49 1.1 Claassen, Van Weele, and van Raaij (2008) Buyer–supplier financing alignment…”