Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing

By Jian-Jun Wang, De-Li Yang. Computers & Operations Research, 2007

382 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f90af100f4367f0ceed8d90b8a5718031167fae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Andrii Shekhovtsov
2. Wojciech Sałabun
3. Jaroslaw Watrobski
4. Metin Dagdeviren

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Andrii Shekhovtsov
2. Wojciech Sałabun
3. Jaroslaw Watrobski
4. Metin Dagdeviren
5. Muhammet Gul
6. Dragan Pamucar
7. Chia-chi Sun
8. Goran Ćirović

In Strategy and Management

1. Andrii Shekhovtsov
2. Wojciech Sałabun
3. Jaroslaw Watrobski
4. Metin Dagdeviren

Citations in the corpus

• Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods (2020, methodology): “The difference between the use of a single synthesized criterion and the synthesis based on the relation of exceedance is that in methods using synthesis to one criterion there is a compensation, while methods using the relation of exceedance by many researchers are considered uncompensated [68,69].”
• Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE (2008, methodology): “If the pairwise comparisons are completely consistent, the matrix A has rank 1 and λmax = n. In this case, weights can be obtained by normalizing any of the rows or columns of A ( Wang and Yang 2007 ).”