Relationships Among Laboratory and Psychometric Measures of Impulsivity: Implications in Substance Abuse and Dependence

By S. Lane, D. Cherek, H. Rhoades, C. Pietras, O. Tcheremissine. 2003

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures (2006, result): “It is notable that several other previous studies have failed to observe relations between self-report and behavioral measures of impulsive behavior (e.g., Crean et al., 2000; Lane et al., 2003; Mitchell, 1999; Reynolds et al., 2004b; White et al., 1994; but see also Kirby et al., 1999; Richards et ”
Sex differences in impulsivity: a meta-analysis. (2011, background): “Four tasks have been widely interpreted as assessing the ability to suppress a dominant or prepotent response, which we will refer to as executive response inhibition (Conners, 2000; Kindlon et al., 1995; Lane et al., 2003; Reynolds et al., 2008; Reynolds, Richards, & de Wit, 2006; Nigg, 2001).”
Dark side of impulsivity — Associations between the Dark Triad, self-report and behavioral measures of impulsivity (2016, result): “Several other previous studies demonstrated that self-report measures of the trait of impulsivity were not related to performance on the behavioral tasks (e.g., Lane et al., 2003; Reynolds et al., 2004, 2006).”
Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: An update and review (2009, unknown): “68) Lane et al. (2007)”