Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: An update and review

By M. Stanford, C. Mathias, D. Dougherty, S. L. Lake, Nathaniel E. Anderson, J. Patton. 2009

1,595 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15be2823d48b5dc2fbb08fea8178d8709877b07a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Margaret L. Kern
2. Martin E. P. Seligman
3. David J. Stillwell
4. Michal Kosinski
5. Andrea Campbell
6. Willibald F. Ruch
7. Fred Luthans
8. R. Proyer

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Martin E. P. Seligman
2. Margaret L. Kern
3. Lyle Ungar
4. H. A. Schwartz
5. Leila Azizi
6. David J. Stillwell
7. Johannes C. Eichstaedt
8. Michal Kosinski

Citations in the corpus

• Automatic personality assessment through social media language. (2015, background): “Five-hundred and 49 users completed the BIS-11, a 30-item scale assessing general and specific dimensions of impulsiveness (Patton, Stanford, & Barratt, 1995; Stanford et al., 2009).”
• Systematic review of psychometric proprieties of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Version 11 (BIS-11). (2012, neutral): “Psychometric Properties of an Italian Version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) in Nonclinical Subjects.”
• Sex differences in impulsivity: a meta-analysis. (2011, methodology): “A recent psychometric evaluation indicated no sex differences on any of the scales (Stanford et al., 2009).”
• The Five Factor Model of personality and evaluation of drug consumption risk (2015, methodology): “These features included five personality traits (NEO-FFI-R); impulsivity (BIS-11), sensation seeking (ImpSS), level of education, age, gender, country of residence, and ethnicity.”
• Spontaneous α Brain Dynamics Track the Episodic “When” (2023, methodology): “Before the MEG recordings, participants ’ impulsiveness (psychological trait measure) was assessed using the French validated BIS-11 (Stanford et al., 2009).”