Genomic Prediction of Breeding Values when Modeling Genotype × Environment Interaction using Pedigree and Dense Molecular Markers

By Juan Burgueño, G. de los Campos, Kent A. Weigel, Jose Crossa. 2012

541 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Genomic selection (GS) has become an important aid in plant and animal breeding. Multienvironment (multitrait) models allow borrowing of information across environments (traits), which could enhance prediction accuracy. This study presents multienvironment (multitrait) models for GS and compares the predictive accuracy of these models with: (i) multienvironment analysis without pedigree and marker information, and (ii) multienvironment pedigree or/and marker-based models. A statistical framework for incorporating pedigree and molecular marker information in models for multienvironment data is described and applied to data that originate from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) multienvironment trials. Two prediction problems relevant to plant breeders are considered: (CV1) predicting the performance of untested genotypes ("newly" developed lines), and (CV2) predicting the performance of genotypes that have been evaluated in some environments but not in others. Results confi rmed the superiority of models using both marker and pedigree information over those based on pedigree information only. Models with pedigree and/or markers had better predictive accuracy than simple linear mixed models that do not include either of these two sources of information. We concluded that the evaluation of such trials can benefi t greatly from using multienvironment GS models.

Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fcfa040d45a47deffea32990bab4c8556292b63a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. M. Sorrells
  2. Jean-Luc Jannink
  3. Rajeev K. Varshney
  4. Jose Crossa
  5. G. de los Campos
  6. Nicolas Heslot
  7. Jesse Poland
  8. Jeffrey B. Endelman

In Plant Science

  1. M. Sorrells
  2. Jean-Luc Jannink
  3. Jose Crossa
  4. Rajeev K. Varshney
  5. Jesse Poland
  6. G. de los Campos
  7. R. Singh
  8. Manish Roorkiwal

Citations in the corpus