Genomic Selection in Wheat Breeding using Genotyping‐by‐Sequencing

By Jesse Poland, Jeffrey B. Endelman, J. Dawson, J. Rutkoski, Shuangye Wu, Y. Manes, Susanne Dreisigacker, Jose Crossa, Hector Sanchez-Villeda, M. Sorrells and 1 more. 2012

678 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Genomic selection (GS) uses genomewide molecular markers to predict breeding values and make selections of individuals or breeding lines prior to phenotyping. Here we show that genotyping‐by‐sequencing (GBS) can be used for de novo genotyping of breeding panels and to develop accurate GS models, even for the large, complex, and polyploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genome. With GBS we discovered 41,371 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a set of 254 advanced breeding lines from CIMMYT's semiarid wheat breeding program. Four different methods were evaluated for imputing missing marker scores in this set of unmapped markers, including random forest regression and a newly developed multivariate‐normal expectation‐maximization algorithm, which gave more accurate imputation than heterozygous or mean imputation at the marker level, although no significant differences were observed in the accuracy of genomic‐estimated breeding values (GEBVs) among imputation methods. Genomic‐estimated breeding value prediction accuracies with GBS were 0.28 to 0.45 for grain yield, an improvement of 0.1 to 0.2 over an established marker platform for wheat. Genotyping‐by‐sequencing combines marker discovery and genotyping of large populations, making it an excellent marker platform for breeding applications even in the absence of a reference genome sequence or previous polymorphism discovery. In addition, the flexibility and low cost of GBS make this an ideal approach for genomics‐assisted breeding.

Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4108f0d610346d775f46ba82cb0867b7f914135

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. M. Thomson
  2. Trevor W. Rife
  3. Yong‐Bi Fu
  4. Jesse Poland
  5. Jose Crossa
  6. Jean-Luc Jannink
  7. Hugh G. Jr Gauch
  8. G. W. Peterson

In Plant Science

  1. M. Thomson
  2. Jose Crossa
  3. Trevor W. Rife
  4. Jesse Poland
  5. Hugh G. Jr Gauch
  6. Jean-Luc Jannink
  7. Cosmos Magorokosho
  8. D. Makumbi

Citations in the corpus