Predicting actions to act predictably: Cooperative partial motion planning with maximum entropy models
By Mark Pfeiffer, Ulrich Schwesinger, Hannes Sommer, Enric Galceran, Roland Yves Siegwart. 2016
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Ocean Engineering, Social Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
- Kris M. Kitani
- Lei Tai
- Kai Oliver Arras
- Amir Sadeghian
- Andrey Rudenko
- Luigi Palmieri
- Michael Herman
- Alexandre Alahi
In Ocean Engineering
- Silvio Savarese
- Alexandre Alahi
- Kris M. Kitani
- Amir Sadeghian
- Lei Tai
- Jean Oh
- Roland Yves Siegwart
- Katharina Muelling
In Social Psychology
- Jean Oh
- Kai Oliver Arras
- Silvio Savarese
- Dorsa Sadigh
- Katharina Muelling
- Anirudh Vemula
- Kris M. Kitani
Citations in the corpus
- A Survey of Deep Network Solutions for Learning Control in Robotics: From Reinforcement to Imitation (2016, neutral): “In robotics, the formulation of IRL offers an efficient solution for learning policies for socially compliant navigation (Okal and Arras, 2016; Pfeiffer et al., 2016; Kretzschmar et al., 2016), where the agent needs to not only avoid collisions with static obstacles but also to behave in a socially…”
- A Survey of State-Action Representations for Autonomous Driving (2018, background): “Thus, Kretzschmar et al. (2014, 2016); Pfei(cid:27)er et al. (2016) use cubic splines to represent the future trajectory of each moving entity.”
- Crowd-Robot Interaction: Crowd-Aware Robot Navigation With Attention-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning (2018, methodology): “Beyond behavioral cloning, inverse reinforcement learning has been used in [10], [11], [34] to learn the underlying cooperation features from human data using the maximum entropy method.”
- Planning and Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles (2018, background): “(115) described learning socially compliant motion planning and human behavior.”
- Deep Local Trajectory Replanning and Control for Robot Navigation (2019, methodology): “In initial experiments, we considered combining the above features through concatenation [36, 11] or outer product operations [53, 54].”
- Human motion trajectory prediction: a survey (2019, methodology): “In the following we review several inverse planning approaches that predict multi-agent motions (Kuderer et al. 2012; Kretzschmar et al. 2014; Pfeiffer et al. 2016; Ma et al. 2017; Lee et al. 2017).”
- Socially Compliant Navigation Through Raw Depth Inputs with Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning (2017, methodology): “However, the requirement of running reinforcement learning in an inner loop makes IRL extremely expensive to run [2], [9], [10].”
- From perception to decision: A data-driven approach to end-to-end motion planning for autonomous ground robots (2016, methodology): “The approaches by Kuderer et al. [9], Pfeiffer et al. [10] and Kretzschmar et al. [11] use the maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning techniques to interaction-aware motion models.”
- Social Attention: Modeling Attention in Human Crowds (2017, methodology): “model with IRL-based approaches such as [17], [18], [24],”
- Reinforced Imitation: Sample Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning for Mapless Navigation by Leveraging Prior Demonstrations (2018, background): “Similarly, Pfeiffer et al. [10] and Kretzschmar et al. [11] present approaches for navigation in dynamic environments based on IRL.”