Moral Spillovers: The Effect of Moral Violations on Deviant Behavior
By Elizabeth Mullen, Janice Nadler. 2008
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc66133c7f80bf3c22c6ab032b107e9e07ccd5b0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Dan Ariely
- Eesha Sharma
- Tom Tyler
- Linda J. Skitka
- Stephan Billinger
- Nina Mazar
- Adam L. Alter
- Nils Stieglitz
In Social Psychology
- Tom Tyler
- Dan Ariely
- Linda J. Skitka
- Nina Mazar
- Adam L. Alter
- Nils Stieglitz
- Daniel Kahneman
- John T. Jost
In Sociology and Political Science
- Dan Ariely
- Eesha Sharma
- Tom Tyler
- Linda J. Skitka
- Nina Mazar
- Adam L. Alter
- Francesca Gino
- B. Bradford
Citations in the corpus
- Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: The Benefits of Self-Regulation (2009, background): “Further, discrepancies can be generalized beyond a particular law 2009] LEGITIMACY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE 329 and shape adherence to a broader range of laws (Mullen and Nadler 2008; Nadler 2005).”
- The Psychology of Moral Conviction (2010, background): “For example, Mullen and Nadler (2008) exposed people to legal decisions that supported, opposed, or were unrelated to their moral convictions.”
- The Social and Political Implications of Moral Conviction (2014, background): “For example, Mullen and Nadler (2008) exposed people to legal decisions that supported, opposed, or were unrelated to their moral convictions.”
- Let’s be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling (2014, background): “A related psychological experiment into moral spillovers is the study by Mullen and Nadler (2008), which investigated whether subjects exposed to an ‘‘immoral’’ outcome (perceived injustice in a court verdict) may be more inclined to steal an indelibly-marked pen, rather than depositing it in the…”
- Financial deprivation selectively shifts moral standards and compromises moral decisions (2014, background): “…that seems globally just; when the system ceases to guarantee fair and just outcomes, its capacity to compel honest, moral behavior weakens as well (Mullen & Nadler, 2008). unfairness, less work has focused specifically on how objective and psychological states of financial deprivation influence…”