Embedding Deep Metric for Person Re-identification: A Study Against Large Variations

By Hailin Shi, Yang Yang, Xiangyu Zhu, Shengcai Liao, Zhen Lei, Weishi Zheng, S. Li. European Conference on Computer Vision, 2016

313 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Person re-identification is challenging due to the large variations of pose, illumination, occlusion and camera view. Owing to these variations, the pedestrian data is distributed as highly-curved manifolds in the feature space, despite the current convolutional neural networks (CNN)’s capability of feature extraction. However, the distribution is unknown, so it is difficult to use the geodesic distance when comparing two samples. In practice, the current deep embedding methods use the Euclidean distance for the training and test. On the other hand, the manifold learning methods suggest to use the Euclidean distance in the local range, combining with the graphical relationship between samples, for approximating the geodesic distance. From this point of view, selecting suitable positive (i.e. intra-class) training samples within a local range is critical for training the CNN embedding, especially when the data has large intra-class variations. In this paper, we propose a novel moderate positive sample mining method to train robust CNN for person re-identification, dealing with the problem of large variation. In addition, we improve the learning by a metric weight constraint, so that the learned metric has a better generalization ability. Experiments show that these two strategies are effective in learning robust deep metrics for person re-identification, and accordingly our deep model significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on several benchmarks of person re-identification. Therefore, the study presented in this paper may be useful in inspiring new designs of deep models for person re-identification.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc448f339e0576311954caad66d731496ef516a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Liang Zheng
  2. Yi Yang
  3. Qi Tian
  4. Shiliang Zhang
  5. Wen Gao
  6. Shaogang Gong
  7. Tao A. Xiang
  8. Xiatian Zhu

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Yi Yang
  2. Tao A. Xiang
  3. Liang Zheng
  4. Dacheng Tao
  5. Luc Van Gool
  6. Qi Tian
  7. Xiaogang Wang
  8. Ling Shao

Citations in the corpus