In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identification

By Alexander Hermans, Lucas Beyer, Bastian Leibe. 2017

3,600 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In the past few years, the field of computer vision has gone through a revolution fueled mainly by the advent of large datasets and the adoption of deep convolutional neural networks for end-to-end learning. The person re-identification subfield is no exception to this. Unfortunately, a prevailing belief in the community seems to be that the triplet loss is inferior to using surrogate losses (classification, verification) followed by a separate metric learning step. We show that, for models trained from scratch as well as pretrained ones, using a variant of the triplet loss to perform end-to-end deep metric learning outperforms most other published methods by a large margin.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Yi Yang
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  5. Xiaogang Wang
  6. Trevor Darrell
  7. Andrew Zisserman
  8. Andrea Vedaldi

In Signal Processing

  1. Andrew Zisserman
  2. Arsha Nagrani
  3. Joon Son Chung
  4. Samuel Albanie
  5. Weidi Xie
  6. Yi Yang
  7. Liang Zheng
  8. Kristen Grauman

Citations in the corpus