Religious Coping and Church‐Based Social Support as Predictors of Mental Health Outcomes: Testing a Conceptual Model

By Jennifer G. Nooney, E. Woodrum. 2002

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012, background): “…syndrome [45], musculoskeletal disease [46], caregiver burden [47–49], psychiatric illness [50, 51], bereavement [52, 53], end-of-life issues [54, 55], overall stress [56–58], natural disasters [59, 60], war [61, 62] or acts of terrorism [63], and miscellaneous adverse life situations [64–66].”
Connecting religion and work: Patterns and influences of work-faith integration (2011, background): “Additionally, Nooney and Woodrum (2002) found that public religious behavior reinforced and enhanced private religious behavior, or perceived role expectations.”
Understanding the Nature and Role of Spirituality in Relation to Coping and Health: A Conceptual Framework. (2005, unknown): “As well, such models can be limited in their focus on a Christian view of religion (Nooney & Woodrum, 2002; Stolley, Buckwalter, & Koenig, 1999) rather than on what could be considered the broader concept of spirituality (StifossHanssen, 1999).”
A DECADE OF RESEARCH ON THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION AND COPING: Things we assumed and lessons we learned (2007, unknown): “Actually, several studies have shown that religious coping methods predict outcomes more strongly than global religious measures (e.g., Roech & Ano, 2003; Loewenthal, MacLeod, Goldblatt, Lubitsh & Valentine, 2000; Nooney & Woodrum, 2002).”