Payments for Ecosystem Services in Nicaragua: Do Market-based Approaches Work?
By G. Hecken, J. Bastiaensen. 2010
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc340949330339dc75caf773edf7a4c28d8f8e8c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- B. Matzdorf
- Sarah Schomers
- Bram Büscher
- J. Bastiaensen
- G. Hecken
- T. Krause
- Julian Rode
- E. Gómez‐Baggethun
In Global and Planetary Change
- B. Matzdorf
- Sarah Schomers
- Bram Büscher
- E. Gómez‐Baggethun
- J. Bastiaensen
- G. Hecken
- T. Krause
- Julian Rode
Citations in the corpus
- Payments for ecosystem services as neoliberal conservation: (Reinterpreting) evidence from the Maloti-Drakensberg, South Africa (2012, background): “Thanks to Daniel Brockington, Gert Van Hecken, Roldan Muradian, the three anonymous reviewers, and the subject editor at Conservation and Society for their valuable comments and suggestions.”
- Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence (2015, background): “In a study conducted among rural farmers in Nicaragua, Van Hecken and Bastiaensen (2010) find “worrying indications” (p.438) that after the introduction of a PES scheme farmers are demanding compensation additionally for areas which they had previously conserved for free. d'Adda (2011) presents…”
- Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view (2010, background): “Muradian et al. (2010), Van Hecken and Bastiaensen (2010) and Vatn (2010), for their part, criticise the ‘mainstream’ PES concept from a broader governance perspective, demonstrating how many PES initiatives ignore the institutional setting in which human interaction takes place, thereby…”
- Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services (2014, background): “Van Noordwijk, M. and B. Leimona.”
- Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries (2013, methodology): “…adoption of integrated silvopastoral farming systems in degraded pasture lands; and (2) the resulting improvements in ecosystems functioning, global environmental benefits, and local socio-economic gains resulting from the provision of said services’’ (Van Hecken and Bastiaensen, 2010b: 426).”