A two-stage multi-fidelity optimization procedure for honeycomb-type cellular materials
By Guangyong Sun, Guangyao Li, Michael Stone, Qing Li. 2010
159 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Multiobjective optimization for empty and foam-filled square columns under oblique impact loading (2013, methodology): “[21] first used the particle swarm optimization (PSO) in honeycomb crashworthiness design based on a two-stage multi-fidelity method for surrogate models.”
- Review of multi-fidelity models (2016, background): “…al. (1998) [222], Knill et al. (1999) [113], Vitali et al. (2002) [223], Umakant et al. (2007) [215], Venkatarman et al. (2006) [218], Choi et al. (2008) [43], Sharma et al. (2008) [198], Sharma et al. (2009) [199], Sun et al. (2010) [202], Goldsmith et al. (2011) [82] and Chen et al. (2015) [40].”
- Review of surrogate modeling in water resources (2012, methodology): “As the high-fidelity models may typically be computationally intensive, there are frameworks concerned with efficiently utilizing the high-fidelity models in conjunction with lower-fidelity models (as surrogates of high-fidelity models) to enhance the overall computational efficiency; these surrogat”
- Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of honeycomb-filled single and bitubular polygonal tubes (2011, background): “5 mm and 1 1 mm are found to be sufficient and suitable to simulate the crushing deformation of the honeycomb panels and the polygonal tubes, respectively [7,30].”
- How does negative Poisson’s ratio of foam filler affect crashworthiness? (2015, methodology): “[14] optimized the honeycomb type of cellular foams for crashworthiness criteria.”