Complex systems and valuation

By Karin E. Limburg, R. O'Neill, Robert Costanza, S. Farber. 2002

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbeffbbb52a4355ddf25b6acd6879bce8007f02d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective (2014, background): “When n ecosystem is reaching a threshold, a small decrease in the physial quantity of ecosystem services can cause a large increase in their arginal economic value, making monetary valuation inapproprite (Limburg et al., 2002).”
The Economic Value of the Pollination Service, a Review Across Scales (2009, background): “The analysis of ecosystem services across scales requires specification of the ecological scale at which the ecosystem service is generated, and the institutional scales of the stakeholders benefiting form this service (e.g. Limburg et al. 2002; Hein et al. 2006; Boyd and Banzhaf 2007).”
Integrating ecological, economic and social aspects to generate useful management information under the EU Directives' ‘ecosystem approach’ (2012, background): “According to Limburg et al. (2002), scaling rules that try to describe the provision and delivery of ES have yet to be quantified and defined.”
Social entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Complementary or disjoint phenomena? (2017, background): “As described, one property of complex systems is that as the diversity of a system’s components increases, the system becomes more resilient (i.e. more able to adapt to a disturbance and return to its previous, or an improved, state; Limburg et al., 2002).”
An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies (2012, background): “For example, stated preference methods have been subject to significant academic scrutiny over the past few decades (Arrow et al., 1993; Bate, 1994; Diamond and Hausman, 1993; Gowdy, 2004; Limburgh et al., 2002; Nunes and van den Bergh, 2001; Sagoff, 1988).”
The Concept of Ecosystem Services Regarding Landscape Research: A Review (2011, background): “A special issue on valuation of ecosystem services, published in the journal Ecological Economics, discusses in detail the background, pro and contra of these three value approaches (de Groot et al., 2002; Farber et al., 2002; Limburg et al., 2002; Wilson and Howarth, 2002).”
Identifying critical natural capital (2003, background): “…we will have to find ways to value and manage the capacity of natural capital to generate and sustain the rent, actively adapt to the dynamic nature of complex systems and learn to live with uncertainty and surprise (Costanza et al., 1993; Levin, 1999; Carpenter et al., 2001; Limburg et al., 2002).”
Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies (2011, background): “References are made to the theoretical construct of a stable equilibrium of ecosystems and the role of humans as disturbance factors (Limburg et al. 2002: 410, 414).”