Assessing the Relative Informativeness and Permanence of Pro Forma Earnings and GAAP Operating Earnings

By Nilabhra Bhattacharya, Ervin L. Black, Theodore E. Christensen, Chad R. Larson. 2003

482 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This study investigates whether market participants perceive pro forma earnings to be more informative and more persistent than GAAP operating income by analyzing a sample of 1,149 actual pro forma press releases. We find that pro forma announcers report frequent GAAP losses and are mostly concentrated in the service and high-tech industries. Our analyses of short-window abnormal returns and revisions in analyst' one-quarter-ahead earnings forecasts indicate that pro forma earnings are more informative and more permanent than GAAP operating earnings. Our evidence suggests that market participants believe pro forma earnings are more representative of "core earnings" than GAAP operating income.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbc71b0033fbf5999eee058bb97fb1962e7a3930

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

  1. Sarah E. McVay
  2. Weili Ge
  3. Benjamin C. Whipple
  4. Patricia M. Dechow
  5. Theodore E. Christensen
  6. Mark T. Soliman
  7. Catherine Schrand
  8. Ana Marques

In Finance

  1. Benjamin C. Whipple
  2. Weili Ge
  3. Mark T. Soliman
  4. Patricia M. Dechow
  5. Sarah E. McVay
  6. Richard M. Frankel
  7. Ana Marques
  8. Theodore E. Christensen

In Strategy and Management

  1. Sarah E. McVay
  2. Weili Ge
  3. Patricia M. Dechow
  4. Benjamin C. Whipple
  5. Mark T. Soliman
  6. Catherine Schrand
  7. Theodore E. Christensen
  8. Ana Marques

Citations in the corpus