The TUM VI Benchmark for Evaluating Visual-Inertial Odometry

By David Schubert, Thore Goll, Nikolaus Demmel, Vladyslav C. Usenko, Jörg Stückler, Daniel Cremers. IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent RObots and Systems, 2018

479 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Visual odometry and SLAM methods have a large variety of applications in domains such as augmented reality or robotics. Complementing vision sensors with inertial measurements tremendously improves tracking accuracy and robustness, and thus has spawned large interest in the development of visual-inertial (VI) odometry approaches. In this paper, we propose the TUM VI benchmark, a novel dataset with a diverse set of sequences in different scenes for evaluating VI odometry. It provides camera images with 1024×1024 resolution at 20 Hz, high dynamic range and photometric calibration. An IMU measures accelerations and angular velocities on 3 axes at 200 Hz, while the cameras and IMU sensors are time-synchronized in hardware. For trajectory evaluation, we also provide accurate pose ground truth from a motion capture system at high frequency (120 Hz) at the start and end of the sequences which we accurately aligned with the camera and IMU measurements. The full dataset with raw and calibrated data is publicly available. We also evaluate state-of-the-art VI odometry approaches on our dataset.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbbc2978758fe459f05d749a0fbd1ef3a3ba3c6c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

  1. Marc Pollefeys
  2. Torsten Sattler
  3. Juan D. Tardós
  4. José M. M. Montiel
  5. Daniel Cremers
  6. Carlos Campos
  7. Richard Elvira
  8. Juan J. Gómez Rodríguez

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Marc Pollefeys
  2. Luc Van Gool
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Jitendra Malik
  5. Andreas Geiger
  6. Trevor Darrell
  7. Abhinav Kumar Gupta
  8. Vladlen Koltun

In Geology

  1. Marc Pollefeys
  2. Torsten Sattler
  3. Juan D. Tardós
  4. José M. M. Montiel
  5. Richard Elvira
  6. Carlos Campos
  7. Juan J. Gómez Rodríguez
  8. Chen Wang

Citations in the corpus