Peer-to-Peer Rental Markets in the Sharing Economy

By Samuel P. Fraiberger, Arun Sundararajan. 2015

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb712106ae7c0e83547f03302e1f9b74639514b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

The “sharing” economy: labor, inequality, and social connection on for‐profit platforms (2017, result): “This argument contrasts with the predictions of Fraiberger and Sundararajan (2015) who assume that low‐income households will disproportionately benefit from asset‐renting schemes such as peer‐to‐peer car rental.”
Pay-per-use business models as a driver for sustainable consumption: Evidence from the case of HOMIE (2018, unknown): “Generally, products and buildings may suffer from increased wear and tear, higher maintenance cost and more rapid depreciation due to intensified and different usage in new sharing and service models (Fraiberger and Sundararajan, 2015) and should be redesigned to support intensified usage (e.”
The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy (2018, unknown): “For example, a firm such as Airbnb provides an online environment in which hosts and guests can socially interact before and after their stay and suggests to potential hosts that they will not only make extra money when they rent out their home, but also (and especially) have great experiences inter”
Coordinating Supply and Demand on an On-Demand Service Platform with Impatient Customers (2019, unknown): “It is easy to see that the optimal k∗ is given by the largest value of k, with k ≤ K, that possesses a feasible λ to (13).”
On-Demand Service Platforms (2018, unknown): “Benjaafar et al. (2018), Fraiberger and Sundararajan (2015), and Jiang and Tian (2018) examine individuals’ decisions to purchase or rent assets in the presence of a product-sharing platform.”
Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation (2017, unknown): “With peer-to-peer-sharing – the focus of this study – in addition car owners could potentially earn back (part of) the car ownership costs by providing their car to others (Fraiberger & Sundararajan, 2015).”
A strategic framework for a profitable business model in the sharing economy (2017, background): “Recent studies (Cohen, Hahn, &Hall, 2016; Fraiberger & Sundararajan, 2015) have shown that customers enjoy very affordable prices (consumer surplus was found to be $6.8 billion in the U.S. in 2015 for Uber, and ranged from 0.8 to 6.6% for P2P rental markets) in the sharing economy.”
Scoping the Sharing Economy: Origins, Definitions, Impact and Regulatory Issues (2016, methodology): “A very preliminary modelling simulation has calibrated data from the traditional US car market and from just one online peer-to-peer rental service (Getaround) to draw very general conclusions that have been much disseminated to the media (Fraiberger & Sundararajan, 2015).”
Welcome to the Gig Economy: neoliberal industrial relations and the case of Uber (2017, background): “Fraiberger and Sundararajan (2015) had similar findings regarding consumer surplus, but also found that the benefits accrued most significantly to belowmedian income consumers.”
The Passions and the Interests: Unpacking the 'Sharing Economy' (2016, background): “…Times’ article, entitled ‘‘Sharing economy benefits lower income groups” (Bradshaw, 2015), cites a modelling simulation as proof that the ‘sharing economy’ will benefit lower income groups and have a democratising effect in terms of access to goods and services (Fraiberger & Sundararajan, 2015).”
Preferences for car sharing services: Effects of instrumental attributes and psychological ownership (2017, background): “The adoption of sharing economy principles enables people to “leverage [their] lifestyles beyond individual possibilities” (Belk, 2007, p.134), which in the long term is assumed to result in improved societal welfare (Fraiberger & Sundararajan, 2015).”
Effects of Consumer‐to‐Consumer Product Sharing on Distribution Channel (2018, unknown): “Fraiberger and Sundararajan (2015) use the US auto-mobile industry data and peer-to-peer car rental data from Getaround to study the welfare and distributional effects of a peer-to-peer rental market.”