Sexism, Hostility toward Women, and Endorsement of Beauty Ideals and Practices: Are Beauty Ideals Associated with Oppressive Beliefs?
By G. Forbes, Linda L. Collinsworth, Rebecca L. Jobe, Kristen Braun, Leslie M. Wise. 2007
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb511910330682c60dbb4537a9c3d873bdaa5cfd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
Citations in the corpus
- Oppressive Beliefs at Play: Associations among Beauty Ideals and Practices and Individual Differences in Sexism, Objectification of Others, and Media Exposure (2010, methodology): “Moreover, and as predicted by the BIO hypothesis, the existence of patriarchal structures and attitudes should result in significant relationships between sexist attitudes and the endorsement of beauty ideal and practices (Forbes et al., 2007).”
- Shape and Significance of Feminine Beauty: An Evolutionary Perspective (2011, background): “Evolutionary and feminist scholars agree that some standards of beauty, such as an emphasis on thinness versus plumpness, vary considerably over time and across cultures (e.g., Forbes et al. 2007; Voracek and Fisher 2002).”
- Benevolent and Hostile Sexism and preferences for romantic partners (2009, methodology): “BS and HS were assessed at Time 1 using Glick and Fiske’s (1996) Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) which is a widely used and validated scale (e.g., Eastwick et al., 2006; Forbes et al., 2007; Glick et al., 2000; Johannesen-Schmidt & Eagly, 2002; Sibley et al., 2007).”