Shape and Significance of Feminine Beauty: An Evolutionary Perspective

By Devendrá Singh, D. Singh. 2011

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ac3b1387597d99a268a2b144febda31aaab5251

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. Schmitt
2. A. Eagly
3. David M. Buss
4. Wendy Wood
5. T. Shackelford
6. P. Jonason
7. W. Rowatt
8. Benjamin Gardner

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. D. Schmitt
2. Wendy Wood
3. David M. Buss
4. A. Eagly
5. T. Shackelford
6. M. Haselton
7. Mark Schaller
8. P. Jonason

In Marketing

1. D. Schmitt
2. David M. Buss
3. Wendy Wood
4. A. Eagly
5. David T. Neal
6. Benjamin Gardner

Citations in the corpus

• Evolutionary Psychology and Feminism (2011, background): “Building on the evolutionary logic of hypothesized adaptations for beauty, Singh and Singh (2011) summarize arguments and evidence that waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) provides one powerful non-arbitrary cue to health and fertility, and so it too should have evolved to become part of a non-arbitrary…”
• Feminism and the Evolution of Sex Differences and Similarities (2011, background): “A clear exception is Singh and Singh ’ s (2011) exposition of research suggesting an evolved preference for men to prefer women with low waist-to-hip ratio because this body shape functions as a signal of good health and fertility.”