The Future of the Capitalist State

By José Ignacio Vigil, M. Villalba. 2004

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb03b7eb6b42e049b69f54e35c068746d1d5d9b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

THE SUBSIDIARIZATION OF SOCIAL POLICIES: ACTORS, PROCESSES AND IMPACTS (2008, background): “Other scholars have gone beyond the local dimension, witnessing how the emerging governance arrangements are highly coherent matching the respective national welfare systems they belong to, following a path-dependent logic which tends to pre-structure the outcome of the current processes of change (”
Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe, 1960–2000 (2004, background): “Accordingly, the scalar organization of state power is no longer understood as a pregiven background structure, but is increasingly viewed as a constitutive, contested, and therefore potentially malleable dimension of political-economic processes (Boyer and Hollingsworth, 1997; Jessop, 2002).”
Trasformismo or transformation? The global political economy of energy transitions (2018, background): “Indeed, as Jessop suggests, socially embedded and regularized institutions and social forces are ‘organized around the expanded reproduction of capital as a social relation’ (Jessop, 2002:7; emphasis added).”
Advocacy networks, choice and private schooling of the poor in India (2010, background): “The first rests on a set of neoliberal arguments about more or less radical destatalization (Jessop 2002), subjecting state organizations to competition and/or the handing over of service delivery to the private sector.”
Rise of China and the global overaccumulation crisis (2008, background): “The decentralization of economic governance in globalizing China is remarkably comparable with the post-Keynesian ‘rescaling of statehood’ in North Atlantic economies (Brenner, 2004; Jessop, 2002; cf. Chen, 2005; Yeung, 2000).”
Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: network governance and the ‘competition state’ (2009, background): “‘Improvement’, ‘re-modelling’ and ‘recalibration’ are also linked to and part of the promotion of economic growth and competitiveness in and through education, through ‘almost permanent institutional and organizational innovation’ (Jessop 2002, 242). Second, this is a developing market, and states (”
Metropolitan Institutional Reform and the Rescaling of State Space in Contemporary Western Europe (2003, background): “However, as Jessop (2002) has indicated, the proliferation of such governance networks has undermined the organizational unity of national states without eroding their functional centrality to the basic tasks of political-economic regulation under contemporary capitalism.”