Antibody i-Patch prediction of the antibody binding site improves rigid local antibody-antigen docking.
By Konrad Krawczyk, Terry Baker, Jiye Shi, Charlotte M. Deane. 2013
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Jeffrey J. Gray
- Brian D. Weitzner
- Sergey Lyskov
- Charlotte M. Deane
- Nicholas A. Marze
- Jiye Shi
- Jared Adolf-Bryfogle
- Daisuke Kuroda
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Jeffrey J. Gray
- Brian D. Weitzner
- Charlotte M. Deane
- Claire Marks
- Jiye Shi
- Konrad Krawczyk
- Sergey Lyskov
- Terry Baker
Citations in the corpus
- SAbDab: the structural antibody database (2013, methodology): “Many of these tools now use only the antibody data, as opposed to general protein data, because this has been shown to increase performance (3,4).”
- SAbPred: a structure-based antibody prediction server (2016, methodology): “When tested on a non-redundant dataset of antibody–antigen structures Antibody i-Patch achieved 77% precision at a recall of 10% (14).”
- Modeling and docking antibody structures with Rosetta (2017, methodology): “In particular, there are two fast-Fourier transform (FFT) rigid-body docking approaches that implement antibody-specific energy potentials: PIPER 12 with the antibody-ADARS potential 13 , and ZDOCK 14 with the antibody i-Patch potential 15 .”