Project Essay Grade: PEG.

By E. B. Page. 2003

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An Overview of Automated Scoring of Essays. (2006, methodology): “Since hiring multiple raters and training them on a scoring rubric is necessary but costly, including an AES system in the assessment process could be a cost-effective option (Bereiter, 2003; Chung & O’Neil, 1997; Page, 2003; Sireci & Rizavi, 1999).”
Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes (2008, unknown): “Early AWE programs, such as Project Essay Grade, employed simple style analyses of surface linguistic features of a text to evaluate writing quality (Page, 2003).”
Automatic Text Scoring Using Neural Networks (2016, background): “Project Essay Grade (Page, 1967; Page, 1968; Page, 2003) is one of the earliest automated scoring systems, predicting a score using linear regression over vectors of textual features considered to be proxies of writing quality.”
Automated writing evaluation: defining the classroom research agenda (2006, background): “of high school student essays (Page, 2003).”