SEPARATING ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION, DEGRADATION, AND LOSS ON CORAL COMMENSALS

By M. Caley, Kathryn A. Buckley, Geoffrey P. Jones. 2001

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ecological Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Per Se (2017, background): “For example, authors suggested that fragmentation allows more small mammal territories (Collins & Barrett 1997, Wolff et al. 1997) and more crab territories (Caley et al. 2001) to be defended, because the edges of individual patches are used as territory boundaries.”
Motile cryptofauna associated with live and dead coral substrates: implications for coral mortality and framework erosion (2012, background): “Metabolic byproducts that are normally fed upon by cryptic symbionts may no longer be available following coral death, subsequently leading to reductions in the abundances (Caley et al. 2001) and biomass of associated species (Enochs and Hockensmith”
Seascape ecology of coastal biogenic habitats: advances, gaps, and challenges (2011, background): “Australia Queensland FE d–mo Caley et al. (2001) 7.”
Theory meets reality: How habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory (2008, background): “…of habitat loss and fragmentation, either by experimentally controlling for habitat amount while varying fragmentation (Collins and Barrett, 1997; Caley et al., 2001) or by comparing many different landscapes and extracting indices of fragmentation that are not correlated with the amount of…”