Ecological Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Per Se
By L. Fahrig. 2017
1,004 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Economics and Econometrics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5472146b8e9907acd968458038c138e72a49f8e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Economics and Econometrics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Indirect effects of habitat loss via habitat fragmentation: A cross-taxa analysis of forest-dependent species (2020, methodology): “We therefore reinforce that negative habitat fragmentation effects should not be dismissed as a “zombie idea”, as suggested by Fahrig (2017) but contested recently (Fletcher Jr. et al., 2018; Fahrig et al., 2019).”
- Mitigating forest biodiversity and ecosystem service losses in the era of bio-based economy (2018, background): “Even though in general the effects of fragmentation are much 519 weaker than the effects of habitat loss on a wide range of ecological responses (Fahrig 2017) 520 ecological research has concluded that if a limited area of species habitats can be protected they 521 should be protected in spatially a”
- Necrobiome Framework for Bridging Decomposition Ecology of Autotrophically and Heterotrophically Derived Organic Matter (2018, background): “A recent meta-review, however, revealed approximately three-quarters of studies showed some measures of positive response by communities affected by habitat fragmentation (Fahrig 2017).”