Impact pathway evaluation: an approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems
By Boru Douthwaitea, Thomas Kubyb, Elske van de Fliertc, Steffen Schulzd. 2003
311 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa901e84d74582ec3a7592d239238446e4ad87f6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Responding to global change: A theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based (2017, background): “Perhaps more fundamentally, approaches based on theory of change can address the well-documented need for learning as a (perhaps the) critical element of innovation in complex systems (Douthwaite et al., 2003; Jordan and Warner, 2010; Klerkx et al., 2010).”
- From drawing board to dining table: The success story of the GIFT project (2004, background): “This contrasts with the traditional characterization of agricultural research as involving a linear chain from output to impact, with minimal engagement between remote parts of the chain, i.e. researchers and fi nal benefi ciaries (Douthwaite et al. 2003).”
- Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment (2010, unknown): “…Mierlo et al., 2010a,b), the interactive learning and action monitoring approach (Regeer et al., 2009) and participatory impact pathway analysis (Douthwaite et al., 2003, 2008), all designed to pro-actively create awareness amongst innovation network actors as regards their position vis-à-vis…”
- Sustainable intensification of agricultural systems in the Central African Highlands: The need for institutional innovation (2016, background): “…using structural conditions for innovation (Klein Woolthuis et al., 2005), (5) levels where interventions to address the constraints are required (Douthwaite et al., 2003), (6) whether addressing these constraints requires short-, middle- or long-term timeframe, and (7) what type of innovation…”