The Context for Political Corruption: A Cross‐National Analysis

By Xia Xin, T. Rudel. 2004

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Six, One, or None? (2010, background): “…that the root causes of corruption are an absence of VA, GE, RQ, RL and/or PS (Schleifer and Vishny, 1993; Johnson et al., 1998; Ades and Di Tella, 1999; Geddes and Neto, 1999; Broadman and Recanatini, 2000; Kang, 2002; Bohara et al., 2004; Xin and Rudel, 2004).2 CFA permits a test of this (just”
Corruption, Norm Violation and Decay in Social Capital (2016, background): “Others have argued that a lack of trust may diminish the sense of doing something wrong or “immoral”, leading to a perception of high corruption in the society (Xin and Ruden, 2004), which in turn may lead to greater prevalence of corruption (Bardhan, 1997; Innes and Mitra, 2013).”
Corruption, Democracy, Economic Freedom, and State Strength (2005, background): “There is evidence from both case studies and cross-national quantitative studies suggesting that states with honest and transparent government institutions tend to experience higher levels of income growth, national wealth, and social achievement (e.g. Cokgezen, 2004; Husted, 1999; Xin and Rudel, 20”
Corruption and Democracy (2009, methodology): “Since corruption has been shown to be affected by a range of other variables (Ades and Di Tella, 1999; Treisman, 2000; Fisman and Gatti, 2002; Chowdhury, 2004; Xin and Rudel, 2004; Goel and Nelson, 2005), as many of these as possible are used as control variables.”