Effect of different initial conditions on a turbulent round free jet
By G. Xu, R. Antonia. 2002
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa3dc220bfd67d7b7a5494efacbf3191dc7e91d1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Christophe Bogey
- Christophe Bailly
- Olivier Marsden
- H. Fellouah
- Andrew Pollard
- C. G. Ball
- J. Mi
- G. Nathan
In Computational Mechanics
- Christophe Bogey
- Christophe Bailly
- Olivier Marsden
- H. Fellouah
- Andrew Pollard
- C. G. Ball
- J. Mi
- G. Nathan
Citations in the corpus
- Reynolds number effects on the behavior of a non-buoyant round jet (2005, methodology): “This value was somewhat lower than the decay constants of 5.8– 6.7 suggested by previous investigators, but seemed to be reasonable, since Xu and Antonia (2002) observed that the decay constants were 5.6 and 6.5 for the nozzle and pipe jets, respectively.”
- Transverse-jet shear-layer instabilities. Part 1. Experimental studies (2007, methodology): “For laminar and transitional conditions at the jet exit, the spatial evolution of the free jet’s shear-layer instability was found to be consistent with those documented in the literature (e.g. Petersen & Samet 1988; Xu & Antonia 2002).”
- Influence of initial turbulence level on the flow and sound fields of a subsonic jet at a diameter-based Reynolds number of 105 (2012, background): “Similar discrepancies between tripped and untripped jets have been found experimentally by Russ & Strykowski (1993), Raman et al. (1994) and Xu & Antonia (2002).”
- PIV measurements of a turbulent jet issuing from round sharp-edged plate (2007, background): “Such observations from scalar measurements were later confirmed by Xu and Antonia (2002) through their hot-wire velocity measurements.”
- Reynolds number effects within the development region of a turbulent round free jet (2009, methodology): “FHW measurements: __ __ , (O) u/Uc at ReD = 86,000 (Xu and Antonia [40]), ( ) u/Uc at ReD = 13,200 (Abdel-Rahman et al.”
- Statistical Properties of Turbulent Free Jets Issuing from Nine Differently-Shaped Nozzles (2010, methodology): “For comparison, the figure also reports the data of Quinn [46] for circular and elliptic OP jets, Hussain and Husain [20] for an elliptic OP jet and Xu and Antonia [54] for circular SC and pipe jets (see Table 1 for more details).”