A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity
By Halbert White. 1980
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Victor Chernozhukov
- Susan Athey
- Christian Hansen
- Guido W. Imbens
- M. D. Cattaneo
- Alexandre Belloni
- Stefan Wager
- James G. MacKinnon
Citations in the corpus
- The Econometrics of Randomized Experiments (2016, methodology): “For the Lalonde data the estimate and Neyman standard error, which are up to a degrees- of-freedom adjustment equal to the White robust standard errors (White, 1980), are τ̂ = 1.794 (ŝe 0.671).”
- Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Digital Experimentation (2014, positive): “We can target each linear mean using the population least-squares projections ( At posterior mean DGP, which has ω = 1 /n and ω d = 1 /n d , this becomes the difference of OLS projections in treatment and control.”
- Applied Linear Regression (2004, background): “…like a rather poor estimate—after all, it is based mostly on the single observation yi—theoretical work by Eicker (1963, 1967), Huber (1967), and White (1980), among others, have shown that replacing σ 2W−1 by a diagonal matrix with the êi2 on the diagonal produces a consistent estimate of…”
- Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries: Review of Lessons and Experience (2004, methodology): “Targeting of transfers in developing countries: review of lessons and experience/ David Coady, Margaret Grosh, John Hoddinott. p. cm. – (World Bank regional and sectoral studies) Includes bibliographical references and index.”
- Dynamic asset allocation under mean-reverting returns, stochastic interest rates, and inflation uncertainty: Are popular recommendations consistent with rational behavior? (2004, methodology): “…set { Θ: (Θ − Θ̂)Ω−1(Θ − Θ̂)′ ≤ 28.87 } where 28.87 is the 95%-percentile of the chi-square distribution with 18 degrees of freedom, and the variancecovariance matrix, Ω, is obtained based on the White (1980) variance-covariance matrix estimator used in calculating standard errors in Table 1.”
- The impact of recent financial shocks on the financing and investment policies of UK private firms (2013, background): “We addressed these issues by adjusting the standard errors that are robust to serial correlations (Arellano, 1987; White, 1980).”
- The impact of voluntary corporate disclosures on the ex-ante cost of capital for Swiss firms (2002, unknown): “The results obtained from estimating regression equation (7) using simple OLS are provided in Table 6, Panels A and B. Testing for the presence of heteroscedasticity does not indicate any problems (White, 1980), and, using Cook’s distance, no influential data points have been detected.”
- Asymptotic inference under heteroskedasticity of unknown form (2004, methodology): “The most commonly used heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator (HCCME) is that proposed by Halbert White in an inEuential Econometrica paper (White, 1980), who built upon Eicker (1963).”
- Effects of Employment Protection on Worker and Job Flows: Evidence from the 1990 Italian Reform (2008, methodology): “Moreover, since the error term of the linear model is heteroskedastic, we compute the White (1980) heteroskedasticity-robust variance matrix.”
- Average Idiosyncratic Volatility in G7 Countries (2004, result): “The Newey-West (1987) tstatistics with 4 lags are in parentheses; and we find essentially the same results using the White (1980)-consistent t-statistics.”
- Time Pressure and Creativity in Organizations: A Longitudinal Field Study (2002, methodology): “To correct for this, all analyses used heteroscedasticity-consistent standard errors (White, 1980), further corrected for clustering of observations within respondents (Rogers, 1993).”