Institutional incentives for managing the landscape: Inducing cooperation for the production of ecosystem services

By R. Goldman, B. Thompson, Gretchen Daily. 2007

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9bd4b6eee825b1271020d4ddcb7a59406c0c478

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

The potential for collaborative agri-environment schemes in England: Can a well-designed collaborative approach address farmers’ concerns with current schemes? (2012, background): “It is not our purpose here to explore and elaborate specific landscape-scale approaches (but see Goldman et al., 2007).”
Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale (2011, background): “These simple rules should be applicable in the field, although it will clearly be more complex than a traditional conservation auction; they will also be applicable to other ecosystem services which have landscapescale synergies (see Goldman et al., 2007).”
Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world (2014, background): “Similarly, focusing on individual-level management structures, such as farms, can lead to trade-offs, at least for the ES that transcend borders between them (Goldman et al., 2007), for example, the quantity and quality of the water supply.”
Mainstreaming ecosystem services through reformed European agricultural policies (2012, background): “Therefore, payments need to encourage coordinated action across farm boundaries (Goldman et al. 2007).”
Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver (2009, background): “The integration of conservation into decision-making processes will be aided by: (1) broad discussion and inquiry into what motivates people and how social norms evolve, especially in the context of nature (eg Ehrlich and Kennedy 2005; Pergams and Zaradic 2008); (2) incorporating traditional knowled”
Economic Factors Affecting Diversified Farming Systems (2013, background): “To the extent that DFS by definition maintain ecosystem services critical to agricultural production, public and private PES schemes could provide economic benefits to DFS if there is private or public willingness to pay for ecosystem services being maintained through diversified farming methods.”
Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes (2014, unknown): “…land management units when some ecosystem services may operate at a greater scale that requires linkages between separate land management units (Moxey et al., 1999; Marggraf, 2003; Groth, 2005; Goldman et al., 2007; Engel et al., 2008; Wunscher et al., 2008; Klimek et al., 2008; ECA, 2011).”