The effect of new technology on energy consumption
By David Popp. 2001
266 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f96ba571eb93cdefa0740166bff21ef59a3fe963
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Richard G. Newell
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- David Popp
- Ilhan Ozturk
- Joëlle Noailly
- C. Tang
- J. Bergh
- Manzoor Ahmad
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Richard G. Newell
- Joëlle Noailly
- Ian Sue Wing
- Adam B. Jaffe
- Jules-Daniel Wurlod
- J. Bergh
- Kenneth T. Gillingham
- William A. Pizer
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- Richard G. Newell
- Ilhan Ozturk
- C. Tang
- Manzoor Ahmad
- Zia Ur Rahman
- E. Tan
- David Popp
Citations in the corpus
- The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation (2010, background): “5 m dollars in long-run energy savings among a subset of industries (Popp, 2001) which spend an average of $2.”
- Energy Prices and the Adoption of Energy-Saving Technology (2008, unknown): “These results are comparable to Popp (2001), whose results pertain to a set of energy intensive industries.19 The industry-region-year interactions control for industry-region shocks but withinregion shocks may be correlated with the price of energy and bias the results.”
- Explaining the declining energy intensity of the U.S. economy (2008, methodology): “…(2) i i i i i i i i i G r G X X P u X X P ɺ ∂ ∂ + = ∂ ∂ − ] , [ ] , [ Following Berndt, Morrison and Watkins (1981), Watkins and Berndt (1992), and especially Popp (2001), industry i's normalized RVCF is specified using a quadratic approximation for G: (3) ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ − − − −…”
- Innovation, foreign direct investment (FDI), and the energy–pollution–growth nexus in OECD region: a simultaneous equation modeling approach (2020, background): “Moreover, although academics have asserted that innovations in technology positively impact energy-savings (Berndt et al. 1993; David 1998; Mountain et al. 1989; Popp 2001a, b), current estimations reflected an insignificant effect.”
- Does urbanization cause increasing energy demand in Pakistan? Empirical evidence from STIRPAT model (2017, result): “The Narayan and Popp (NP afterwards)[51] unit root test is superior to other unit root tests such as: (i) there is no need to have information about the possible timing of structural break stemming in the series because NP test determines the break dates endogenously within model.”
- The impact of green innovation on energy intensity: An empirical analysis for 14 industrial sectors in OECD countries (2018, methodology): “Finally, we present the result of estimations with patent stocks composed only by the subset of technologies identified as directly related to energy consumption technologies by Popp (2001), in order to control the robustness of our definition of green patents.”
- Environmental and climate innovation: Limitations, policies and prices (2013, background): “Popp (2001) uses energy-related patents as a proxy for energy innovation, and finds that 1/3 of the overall response of energy use to prices was due to induced innovation, and 2/3 to factor substitution.”
- Modeling endogenous technological change for climate policy analysis (2008, background): “…successful in isolating the effect on future energy use and emissions of inputs to innovation such as R&D (e.g., Fisher-Vanden et al., 2006, 2004), outputs from innovation such as patents (e.g., Popp, 2001), and direct price-induced accumulation of energy-saving knowledge (e.g., Sue Wing, 2008b).”