Energy Prices and the Adoption of Energy-Saving Technology

By Joshua Linn. 2008

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65a7d216be5b5c5691270d401c6e51c36a865e41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Does urbanization cause increasing energy demand in Pakistan? Empirical evidence from STIRPAT model (2017, result): “These results are contradictory with Linn [64], he found that adoption of advanced technology saves energy via lowering energy intensity and the same is noted by Popp [65] in the case of the USA.”
Improving the Energy-Efficiency of Buildings: The Impact of Environmental Policy on Technological Innovation (2012, background): “Linn (2008) suggests to fix the weights wis , so they do not change over time.”
Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change (2009, background): “Finally, Linn (2008) looks at the effect of energy prices on the adoption of energy saving technology in the US manufacturing sector.”
Explaining the declining energy intensity of the U.S. economy (2008, methodology): “Linn (2006) identifies this effect using the difference between the energy intensities of incumbent and entrant manufacturing plants, while Popp (2001) uses the cumulated stocks of energy patents in each industry as direct proxy for the intangible output of innovation.”
The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation (2010, background): “sector, technology adoption explains just a small portion of changes in energy demand during the 1970 s and 1980 s (Linn, 2008).”
Adoption Versus Adaptation, with Emphasis on Climate Change (2012, background): “Linn (2008) shows that financial incentives have a positive effect on adoption of energy conservation technologies but that the elasticity of adoption in response to financial incentives is low.”