Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research

By James E. Bartlett. 2001

3,969 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f95a6cedc3cb3db2f8e26bf61aa42c175a009937

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Dierk Raabe
2. Hyunae Lee
3. S. Zaefferer
4. Paul S. Licker
5. A. Molla
6. W. Bleck
7. Jin-young Kim
8. Namho Chung

Citations in the corpus

• Impact of digital Sharia banking systems on cash-waqf among Indonesian Muslim youth (2021, unknown): “This sample is considered more than adequate based on Bartlett et al. (2010), which required a minimum sample of 118 people for a research using continuous data (data intervals and ratios).”
• Relation between microstructure and mechanical properties of a low-alloyed TRIP steel (2013, background): “If this number is not known beforehand, then a value of 0.5, which is the largest possible variability, gives an upper bound for the sample size (Bartlett et al., 2001) Using Equation 3.1 with a variability of 0.5, a confidence level of 95 %, and a level of precision of 1 %, one obtains a sample…”
• Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies (2012, methodology): “is used, a larger sample size is likely to be needed because of the “design effect”.[10-12] In case of impact study, P may be estimated at 50% to reflect the assumption that an impact is expected in 50% of the population.”
• Sample Size Determination in Survey Research (2020, methodology): “Similarly, a plot of sample size obtained from the proposed adjusted margin of error, CSS1, and Sample size obtained from Bartlett, Kortlik and Huggins [1], SS2, for continuous estimand versus Population is shown by Fig.”
• Understanding consumer intention to participate in online travel community and effects on consumer intention to purchase travel online and WOM: An integration of innovation diffusion theory and TAM with trust (2016, unknown): “Bartlett, Kotrlik, and Higgins (2010) pointed out that when determining the sample size for an SEM research, 10 observations per indicator (independent variable) is recommended.”
• The Role of Augmented Reality for Experience-Influenced Environments: The Case of Cultural Heritage Tourism in Korea (2018, background): “According to Barlett, Kotrlik, and Higgins (2001), the sample size for a PLS estimation is required to exceed 10 times the number of measurement items of the most complex construct, which is 10 in this study (attitudes toward a destination).”
• Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research (2016, unknown): “Probably the most common and time effective way to ensure minimum samples are met is to increase the sample size by up to 50% in the first distribution of the survey (Bartlett et al., 2001).”
• Perceived E-Readiness Factors in E-Commerce Adoption: An Empirical Investigation in a Developing Country (2005, methodology): “In order to obtain an MRSS of 150 to 200, the ISS had to be five times larger than the MRSS.”
• eCommerce adoption in developing countries: a model and instrument (2005, background): “In addition, a second wave of mailings ware made to a random sample of non-respondents [3].”